Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy: A Comparable Alternative to Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt for Obstructive Hydrocephalus Secondary to Infratentorial Tumors

Authors

  • Faiq Sheikh Department of Neurosurgery, Punjab Institute of Neurosciences (PINS), Lahore – Pakistan
  • Shehzad Safdar Department of Neurosurgery, Punjab Institute of Neurosciences (PINS), Lahore – Pakistan
  • Mubashir Malik Department of Neurosurgery, PINS, Lahore.
  • Muhammad Abuzar Rauf Department of Neurosurgery, Punjab Institute of Neurosciences (PINS), Lahore – Pakistan
  • Rabia Saleem Department of Neurosurgery, Punjab Institute of Neurosciences (PINS), Lahore – Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36552/pjns.v25i4.605

Keywords:

Obstructive Hydrocephalus, Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt (VPS), Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy (ETV)

Abstract

Objective: To establish ETV  as a comparable alternative to ventriculoperitoneal shunt for obstructive hydrocephalus secondary to infratentorial tumors.

Methods: 40 Patients with infratentorial tumors presenting with hydrocephalus were enrolled in a prospective descriptive case series. Symptoms, neurological examinations, CT scan and intra-operative findings were used detect the complications at 03 months.

Results:   Mean age = 31.98 ± 15.24 years, female to male ratio of 1:1.2. The KPS score of the participants was ? 70% and ETVSS ?80. Average operative mean time was 21 ± 2.82 minutes. Within first week, the improvement in symptoms was recorded (CI=95%): headache – 87.5% (p < 0.001), nausea vomiting - 84% (p < 0.001), gait disturbance – 59.3% (p=0.442) seizures improvement -100% (p=0.016) and urinary incontinence – 66.7% (p=0.687). Radiological improvement in hydrocephalus on CT scan was seen in one patient within 24 hours – 2.5% (p= <0.001), 12.5% (p<0.001) after two weeks and 87.5% (p= <0.001) after three months post-operatively (CI 95%). Most common of these were decrease in the size of third ventricle and decrease in the size of frontal horns of lateral ventricles.  However, complete resolution of radiologic features was observed in two patients only 5% (p<0.001). However, complete resolution of radiologic features was not observed in any patient. No intra-operative or post-operative complication of ETV was recorded.

Conclusion: ETV is a quick and safe method for CSF diversion in obstructive hydrocephalus alleviating the need for placement of VP shunt hardware, thus eliminating foreign body related cranio-abdominal complications.

References

1. 1. Anania P, Battaglini D, Balestrino A, D’Andrea A, Prior A, Ceraudo M, Rossi DC, Zona G, Fiaschi P. The role of external ventricular drainage for the management of posterior cranial fossa tumours: a systematic review. Neurosurgical Review. 2021 Jun;44:1243-53.
2. Abdollahzadeh-Hosseini SM, Allahdini HR. Management of hydrocephalus in posterior cranial fossa tumors. Acta Medica Iranica. 2006:89-94.
3. Alli S, Isik S, Rutka JT. Posterior Fossa and Brainstem Tumors in Children. InPrinciples of Neurological Surgery 2018 Jan 1 (pp. 183-203). Elsevier.
4. Khan F, Rehman A, Shamim MS, Bari ME. Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt survival in patients developing hydrocephalus After cranial surgery. Turkish neurosurgery. 2016 Jan 1;26(3):369-77.
5. Reddy GK, Bollam P, Caldito G, Willis B, Guthikonda B, Nanda A. Ventriculoperitoneal shunt complications in hydrocephalus patients with intracranial tumors: an analysis of relevant risk factors. Journal of neuro-oncology. 2011 Jun;103(2):333-42.
6. Reddy GK, Bollam P, Caldito G. Long-term outcomes of ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery in patients with hydrocephalus. World neurosurgery. 2014 Feb 1;81(2):404-10.
7. Bouras T, Sgouros S. Complications of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. World neurosurgery. 2013 Feb 1;79(2):S22-e9.
8. ixon HZ, Hamandi YM, Mahmmoud AM, Hoz SS, Al-Sharshahi ZF. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for obstructive hydrocephalus. roneuro [Internet]. 2020 Jun. 15 [cited 2021 Dec. 8];34(2):269-74.
9. Péus D, Newcomb N, Hofer S. Appraisal of the Karnofsky Performance Status and proposal of a simple algorithmic system for its evaluation. BMC medical informatics and decision making. 2013 Dec;13(1):1-7.
10. Deopujari CE, Karmarkar VS, Shaikh ST. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy: success and failure. Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society. 2017 May;60(3):306.
11. Greenberg MS, ed. Principles of Neurological Surgery. 9th ed. NY Thieme;2020:413
12. Gummadidala SS, Jyothi B. Analysis of Most Prevalent Clinical Features Associated with Posterior Fossa Tumors. International Journal of Contemporary Medicine Surgery and Radiology. 2018;3(1):115-20.
13. Prasad KS, Ravi D, Pallikonda V, Raman BV. Clinicopathological study of pediatric posterior fossa tumors. Journal of pediatric neurosciences. 2017 Jul;12(3):245.
14. Cheng H, Hong W, Mei Z, Wang X. Surgical management of non-communicating hydrocephalus in patients: meta-analysis and comparison of endoscopic third ventriculostomy and ventriculoperitoneal shunt. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2015 Mar 1;26(2):481-6.
15. Jiang L, Gao G, Zhou Y. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy and ventriculoperitoneal shunt for patients with noncommunicating hydrocephalus: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis. Medicine. 2018 Oct;97(42).

Downloads

Published

2021-12-31

Issue

Section

Original Articles