Six months Analysis of Posterior Fossa Surgery in Neurosurgery Unit-I, Punjab Institute of Neurosciences (PINS)
Keywords:
Posterior fossa tumours, CP angle SOLAbstract
Objective: This is a prospective study. Posterior fossa tumors are a common entity presented in our tertiary care neurosurgical setup. Although the treatment of posterior fossa tumor has underwent a lot of changes over the period of last two decades but unfortunately in the developing countries the Neurosurgical facilities are still not up to the mark.
Materials and Methods: We analyzed the posterior fossa surgery done for the last six months (Feb. 2017 – Aug. 2017) in Neurosurgery Unit I of Punjab Institute of Neurosciences.
Results: A total of 15 cases were operated from Feb 2017 to Aug 2017. Immediate outcome was seen at the time of discharge. Nine out of 15 patients were female (60.00%), 6 patients were male (40%). Maximum 6 cases (40.00%) were seen in 3rd decade of life. Main presenting complain was headache 3 cases (20.00%) followed by vomiting 7 cases (46.66%), vertigo in 5 cases (33.33%), hearing and visual loss in 4 cases (26.66%) and balance disturbance was observed in 3 cases (20.00%). Regarding location 6 cases (40.00%) were tumor midline posterior fossa SOL, 5 cases (33.3%) were CP angle lesions, 3 cases (20.00%) were in cerebellar hemisphere and 1 case (06.60%) was noted in the 4th ventricle. Nine of procedure (60.00%) remained continued for 4 – 8 hours and remaining 6 took up to 4 hours (40.00%). Gross total excision was achieved in 5 cases (33.33%), Maximum debulking (more than 80 percent tumour removal) was achieved in 10 cases (66.66%). Associated procedure V-P Shunt was done in 8 cases (53.33%) and EVD in 4 cases (26.6%).
Complications: CSF leakage and re-exploration for dural repair was needed in 1 case (06.60%).
Outcome: Ten patients were discharged on different status (66.66%) while mortality was noted in 5 cases (33.33%).
References
2. Macewen W. Meningitis, abscess of the brain, infective sinus thrombosis. In: Pyogenic Infective Diseases of the Brain and Spinal Cord. Glasgow: J. Maclehose & Sons, 1893: 354.
3. Starr MA. Brain Surgery. New York: William Wood, 1893: 29.
4. Goodrich JT. Landmarks in the history of neurosurgery. In: Rengachary SS, Ellenbogen R, eds. Principles of Neurosurgery, 2nd ed. New York: Elsevier Mosby, 20055.
5. CB Lissa and Nanda A. Surgery of the Posterior Cranial Fossa: Historical Aspects.
6. I. Dallan, P. Castelnuovo, C. Vicini, and M. Tschabit-scher. The natural evolution of endoscopic approaches in skull base surgery: robotic-assisted surgery? Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2011 Dec; 31 (6): 390–394.
7. Adeleye AO, Fasunla JA, Young PH. Skull base sur-gery in a large, resource-poor, developing country with few neurosurgeons: prospects, challenges, and need. World Neurosurg. 2012 Jul; 78 (1-2): 35-43.
8. Battistella PA, Ruffilli R, Viero F, Bendagli B, Condini A. Brain tumors: classification and clinical aspects. Pediatr Med Chir. 1990 Jan-Feb; 12 (1): 33-9.
9. Srinivasarao. S.G, Jyothi B. Analysis of most prevalent clinical features associated with posterior fossa tumors International Journal of Contemporary Medicine Sur-gery and Radiology, 2018; 3 (1): 115-120.
10. Marx S, Reinfelder M, Matthes M, et al. Frequency and treatment of hydrocephalus prior to and after posterior fossa tumor surgery in adult patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018 May; 160 (5): 1063-1071. J Neurosurg. 2005 Sep; 103 (3 Suppl): 247-52.
11. Morelli D, Pirotte B, Lubansu A et.al. Persistent hydro-cephalus after early surgical management of posterior fossa tumors in children: is routine preoperative endo-scopic third ventriculostomy justified? J Neurosurg. 2005 Sep; 103 (3 Suppl): 247-52.
12. Sainte-Rose C, Cinalli G, Roux FE, Maixner R, et al. Management of hydrocephalus in pediatric patients with posterior fossa tumors: the role of endoscopic third ventriculostomy.J Neurosurg. 2001 Nov; 95 (5): 791-7.
13. Al-Shatoury HAH, Brian HK.Posterior Fossa Tumors Treatment & Management Pak J Med Sci. 2016 Nov-Dec; 32 (6): 1439–1443.
14. Jagannathan S, K Hari. Anaesthetic considerations for
posterior fossa surgery. Continuing Education in Anae-sthesia Critical Care & Pain, Volume 14, Issue 5, 1 October 2014: Pages 202–206, Published: 19 December 2013.
15. Flexman AM, Merriman B, Griesdale DE et al. Infra-tentorial neurosurgery is an independent risk factor for respiratory failure and death in patients undergoing intracranial tumor resection.J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2014 Jul; 26 (3): 198-204.
16. Qureshi AI, Suarez JI, Parekh PD, Bhardwaj A. Pre-diction and timing of tracheostomy in patients with infratentorial lesions requiring mechanical ventilatory support. Crit Care Med. 2000 May; 28 (5): 1383-7.
17. Altaf I, Vohra AH, and Shahzad Shams S. Management of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak following Posterior Cranial Fossa Surgery.Pak J Med Sci. 2016 Nov-Dec; 32 (6): 1439–1443.
18. Shaikh HA, Bokhari I, Rehman L et al. Surgical Out-come of Posterior Fossa Brain Tumors. Journal of Sur-gery Pakistan (International) 19 (1) January – March 2014.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 BABAR BUTT, MUHAMMAD MOHSEN SHIEKH, NABILA ., HINA ANWAR, Muhammad Anwar Chudary, Rizwan Masood ButtThe work published by PJNS is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). Copyrights on any open access article published by Pakistan Journal of Neurological Surgery are retained by the author(s).





